
Faith and reason, 1000 to 1700 · 1691
Sor Juana’s right to study
Overview
A mind does not ask permission to study. Blame aimed at a desire someone else planted is a smaller charge than it pretends.
Sor Juana writes in a world that has already decided what a mind like hers is for, and she answers the decision. The right to study, in her argument, is not a favor a superior grants when the mood is kind. A mind does not ask permission to become a mind. Silence can be forced. The thinking is not thereby shown to have been a fault.
Read more (2 more paragraphs)
She also turns the blame around. The accusation aimed at a woman’s knowledge or desire often names a hunger that the accusers themselves planted, praised and then punished. The charge looks moral. The construction of the charge is the thing to see. A rule that creates the appetite and then condemns the person for having it has not made a clean case.
The poems and the Reply do this in different registers. One is argument in prose against a bishop. One is a dream of a mind that keeps climbing after the household is asleep. In Ideas the school is that refusal: learning is how a person declines a smaller life someone else designed.
Where it answers
How do we know?
Knowledge is open to anyone who studies, and it can be found anywhere, even in a kitchen.
Key terms
- Right to study
- Sor Juana’s defense of a woman’s freedom to learn.
- Reason and faith
- Her claim that the arts and sciences lead toward theology, not away from it.
- Self-defense of a mind
- Her letter’s answer to a bishop who told her to give up secular study.
In their words
“If Aristotle had cooked, he would have written much more.”
Further reading
- Response to Sor Filotea · Sor Juana Inés de la Cruz
- First Dream · Sor Juana Inés de la Cruz
Learn this
3 lessons on the climb
Compare
Cite or share this page
A plain reference you can paste into notes or an essay:
Quest2Reason. “Sor Juana’s right to study.” https://quest2reason.com/learn/ideas/respuesta. Accessed 13 November 2026.
